Trying to understand our president’s projection and self
chosen identity in the international stage as America’s atoner perhaps can only
be done by looking at aspects of his own autobiography. His understanding that
there is something to heal about America’s past, and he is the one called to do
it (“F
or those who question the character and cause
of my nation, I ask you to look at the concrete actions we have taken in just
nine months.”) fits the psychological profile of a man with a severely
wounded ego as a boy and who grows to overcompensate.
In a way it's a version of the Napoleonic complex. But
instead of making up for short stature they make up for incompletely developed
egos, for lack of a healthy relationship with a father.
These are huge egos that become so from an over inflated
sense of self-importance. They have the need to constantly having to prove
themselves and their sense of self-worth, before themselves and before the
world, by feats which bring them approval and adulation from others as
surrogate fathers ("Look at me daddy, look at me! I can do it"). As
if trying to reconcile their separated parents, these wounded egos seek to reconcile the
world, often carrying on their shoulders guilt for sins that are no theirs.
They keep trying on various identities, or doing things in
music, art, politics, until they find that which guarantees and satisfies the
craved attention.
In the political arena these men could be dangerous. They
are not true ideologues but use whatever ideology is popular and convenient at
the moment to prop themselves up. This leads to the irrationality and the
inflexibility of dictatorial tendencies. Any attack on their ideology or plans
is a personal attack on them and their wounded egos. That ego is usually
protected by an identity super structure, a suit of armor made of an alloy of
inherited or self-tailored identities of race, nationality, culture, etc. Any
criticism must be the result of some vast conspiracy, vast enough to match
their egos.
They are not truly original thinkers because their need to
seek approval has led them to the creation of a mental collage of what is
intellectually popularly available. The ideology or political plans they dress
themselves with must be of necessity large in scope, utopian and capable of
providing the space needed for their large plans. Large ideologies serve to
reinforce in them the conviction that only they can make a reality the ideology,
because only they are in possession of the quasi-messianic qualities necessary
to bringing it to fruition.
Among those feats which prove to them and reinforce their
sense of self-worth and need for constant approval and adulation are long
speeches, as for example in the UN in the case of politicians. The rhetorical
content of their speeches is full of "I, me, I am" and so on (“I prohibited the use of torture. I ordered the prison at
Guantanamo Bay closed”).
Benevolent examples of these egos and their sense of
grandiosity may include Bill Clinton, or artists like Elton John. In all cases,
the local stage, the local public square is not large enough. They need that
largest one in which they cannot be upstaged: the world stage.
Examples of the non-benevolent kind in politics include
Fidel Castro, Ghaddafi, Chavez, Ahmadenijad (Hitler being the classic). They also
have in common claims to past grievances from which their countries need to
heal. Certainly President Obama cannot be compared to them, but why do these
same men continue to express their admiration and identification with President
Obama?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home